I agree that both have their own strengths. But when it comes to "adaptation," an anime that stays faithful to the original work is a good anime. Kyoto Animation is the gold standard in this regard.
From the perspective of an animation director, the difficulty in adapting a four-panel manga lies in how to maintain the pacing within 30 minutes. Yutaka Yamamoto and Tatsuya Ishihara did a great job
From the perspective of directorial research: original voice acting is part of the director's performance. Casting and directing voice actors are also part of the director's work.
"Ghost in the Shell" taught me to think about "what is the true self." In this age of AI, this question is becoming increasingly meaningful.
The art design of this batch of LDs is truly much more exquisite than the current BDs. The package design of the LD era is a lost art.
The writing of a "mentor" character is very particular. A good mentor should be a presence that drives the protagonist's growth without stealing their spotlight.
From the perspective of a director's research: A good director must place great importance on the film score. The collaboration between Makoto Shinkai and RADWIMPS is the perfect example.
It would be even more guaranteed if ufotable's director Hikaru Kondo were involved. His use of cinematography and CG is top-tier in the industry.
As an animation director researcher, I look into the production team behind the scenes and analyze the directorial techniques. Transforming emotional resonance into rational analysis allows me to prol
From the perspective of directorial studies, Kyoto Animation's new generation of directors is becoming increasingly mature. Since Naoko Yamada's departure, they have cultivated quite a bit of new tale
